Obscenity reports in Chicago

A small IUCR statute group

Obscenity on the CPD extract is the primary type assigned when the report was written that way. Related conduct can also be filed under Sex Offense or other types depending on the code. This page does not add those types together. The headline is 91 rows labeled Obscenity.

Because 91 is a small count inside 410,083 city incidents, a handful of recodes can move the total. Cite the harvest as indexed. Do not treat 91 as a stable annual official statistic published by CPD in a yearbook; it is the open-data primary-type count in this extract.

Sex Offense remains a separate hub. The 91 obscenity rows among 410,083 city incidents are a narrow statute group. Do not merge the types. This page does not reproduce alleged content.

Cite 91 among 410,083 Chicago incidents. Sex Offense is a separate hub. Do not merge the types. This page does not reproduce alleged content. Small counts move when a few rows recode; cite the harvest.

Share of the Chicago extract

Ninety-one rows are a tiny slice of 410,083 indexed Chicago reports. The type still has a hub so rare IUCR labels remain findable. Official community area names are the city's 77 areas. Maps use block-level geography and must not be treated as identifying a household.

Small counts should not be turned into neighborhood rankings. A difference of a few reports is noise for that purpose.

Small counts are unstable. A few recodes can move 91. Cite the harvest. Do not build a community-area ranking from 91 city-wide rows. Official community area names are the 77-area list.

Platform takedowns and FCC actions are not CPD incident rows. Official community area names are the 77 areas. Do not rank neighborhoods on 91 city-wide rows. Block-level maps are not household identifications. An arrest flag is not a conviction. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify charges.

Reading the obscenity table

Filter the 91 rows by date and community area. Description fields, if present, are CPD's. This narrative will not quote alleged content. Arrest flags are not convictions. Missing geography stays blank. LocalCrimeVault does not impute a community area.

Respectful use is aggregate report volume. The table is a public record of how CPD labeled 91 incidents, not a gallery of materials.

Platform takedown statistics and FCC actions are not police-incident rows. Quote 91 as CPD IUCR primary type Obscenity. Block-level maps are not household identifications. An arrest flag is not a conviction. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify charges.

What 91 is not

It is not an FCC or platform takedown count, not a library-challenge tally, and not a court caseload. Quote 91 as IUCR primary type Obscenity among 410,083 Chicago incidents.

CPD and the City of Chicago publish the incidents. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify charges.

Chicago hub placement

The obscenity type hub holds the live table. The Chicago hub places these 91 rows beside Sex Offense and the rest of the IUCR mix so the labels stay distinct. A cross-city page follows other agencies' obscenity statutes, which may be rare or absent on their public feeds.

Cite 91 as Chicago Police Department incident rows with IUCR primary type Obscenity among 410,083 city reports. Keep Sex Offense on its own hub. This page does not reproduce alleged content. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify charges.

Because 91 is a small count, a handful of recodes can move the total. Cite the harvest. Do not treat 91 as a sealed annual yearbook cell. Do not rank community areas on 91 city-wide rows.

Citing a rare statute group without reproducing content

FCC, platform-moderation, and library-challenge tallies are different systems. They are not this 91. Quote the open-data primary type if that is your question. An arrest flag is not a conviction.

Maps must stay coarse. Block-level ranges and official community area names (77 areas) are not household identifications. Record the 91 / 410,083 pair. The overlay table is for aggregate date and area, not a gallery of materials.

Cite 91 with the 410,083 city denominator. Rare IUCR types still need a precise label. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify these charges or reproduce alleged content on this page.

Questions

How many obscenity reports are in the Chicago CPD index?

This extract lists 91 Chicago incidents with IUCR primary type Obscenity, in a city file of 410,083 reports. The source is Chicago Police Department open data. The figure counts police reports, not convictions, unique people, or platform takedowns. LocalCrimeVault does not reclassify CPD charges. Obscenity is 91 rows among 410,083 indexed Chicago incidents.

Is obscenity the same as sex offense in this data?

No. CPD files Obscenity and Sex Offense as separate primary types. This page covers only the 91 obscenity rows. Combining them without disclosure mixes official labels. Read IUCR codes on each type table. This page does not reproduce alleged content. Keep the 91 obscenity rows separate from Sex Offense.

Does an obscenity row mean a conviction?

No. Public incident rows are reports. Charges can be declined or amended. The 91 count is report volume among 410,083 indexed Chicago incidents. Court outcomes live in other systems. The 91 count is report volume among 410,083 city incidents, not convictions.

Why is the count so small compared with theft?

Theft is a much larger primary type in the same city extract of 410,083 reports. Obscenity is a narrow statute group; this harvest contains 91 such rows. Small counts are expected for rare IUCR types. Do not rank community areas on 91 city-wide rows. Theft is a separate high-volume type in the same 410,083-incident extract; obscenity is 91 rows.